<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Agora Telegraph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agoratelegraph.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agoratelegraph.com</link>
	<description>Freedom Lovers Unite!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 14:03:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mayan Calendar Myth Debunked! by Nearly one in seven people worldwide think the world will end this year. &#171; Stupid Evil Bastard</title>
		<link>http://agoratelegraph.com/2012/03/06/mayan-calendar-myth-debunked/#comment-1852</link>
		<dc:creator>Nearly one in seven people worldwide think the world will end this year. &#171; Stupid Evil Bastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 14:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agoratelegraph.com/?p=2211#comment-1852</guid>
		<description>[...] on December 21st of this year. It doesn&#8217;t predict any such thing, but no matter how many times its debunked there is still a not insignificant number of people who believe it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on December 21st of this year. It doesn&#8217;t predict any such thing, but no matter how many times its debunked there is still a not insignificant number of people who believe it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Immorality of the Social Contract by afreeman</title>
		<link>http://agoratelegraph.com/2012/04/29/the-immorality-of-the-social-contract/#comment-1825</link>
		<dc:creator>afreeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 20:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agoratelegraph.com/?p=3128#comment-1825</guid>
		<description>@ Boussac

What do you call the relationships people have with their husband, wife, boyfriend, girlfriend, coworkers, customers, classmates, grocery store employees, the pizza guy, the 24 hour fitness trainer, GoDaddy.com, Netflix....? The list goes on and on but I think you get the point.

The truth is that, for most of us, there are really only two types of relationships in our lives that are NOT already &quot;peaceful and mutually voluntary&quot;. 

The first is the relationship we have with our family during childhood (i.e. parents/grandparents/siblings etc.) It is true that we do not get to choose whom these people are or whether or not to interact with them. Fortunately, however, once we reach adulthood, these &quot;forced family ties&quot; evolve into voluntary relationships. In other words, your parents, siblings, etc have to be nice to you if they expect you to ever visit them.

The second type of relationship that is not already &quot;peaceful and mutually voluntary&quot; is the relationship between a so-called &quot;citizen&quot; and the state. Unfortunately, this relationship never evolves into a &quot;peaceful and mutually voluntary&quot; one.

The truth is, most of us live 90 or more percent of our lives in so-called Anarchy already. So I say, let&#039;s give up the 10 percent addiction to force and violence (aka the state). And a good first step would be educating people on the absurdity of the &quot;social contract&#039;. 

For more on this subject, check out Lysander Spooner&#039;s essay, No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority. It&#039;s not exactly a quick read but it makes some extremely powerful arguments. SPOILER ALERT: The U.S. Constitution isn&#039;t a real contract either!!!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Boussac</p>
<p>What do you call the relationships people have with their husband, wife, boyfriend, girlfriend, coworkers, customers, classmates, grocery store employees, the pizza guy, the 24 hour fitness trainer, GoDaddy.com, Netflix&#8230;.? The list goes on and on but I think you get the point.</p>
<p>The truth is that, for most of us, there are really only two types of relationships in our lives that are NOT already &#8220;peaceful and mutually voluntary&#8221;. </p>
<p>The first is the relationship we have with our family during childhood (i.e. parents/grandparents/siblings etc.) It is true that we do not get to choose whom these people are or whether or not to interact with them. Fortunately, however, once we reach adulthood, these &#8220;forced family ties&#8221; evolve into voluntary relationships. In other words, your parents, siblings, etc have to be nice to you if they expect you to ever visit them.</p>
<p>The second type of relationship that is not already &#8220;peaceful and mutually voluntary&#8221; is the relationship between a so-called &#8220;citizen&#8221; and the state. Unfortunately, this relationship never evolves into a &#8220;peaceful and mutually voluntary&#8221; one.</p>
<p>The truth is, most of us live 90 or more percent of our lives in so-called Anarchy already. So I say, let&#8217;s give up the 10 percent addiction to force and violence (aka the state). And a good first step would be educating people on the absurdity of the &#8220;social contract&#8217;. </p>
<p>For more on this subject, check out Lysander Spooner&#8217;s essay, No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority. It&#8217;s not exactly a quick read but it makes some extremely powerful arguments. SPOILER ALERT: The U.S. Constitution isn&#8217;t a real contract either!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Immorality of the Social Contract by Boussac</title>
		<link>http://agoratelegraph.com/2012/04/29/the-immorality-of-the-social-contract/#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>Boussac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 19:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agoratelegraph.com/?p=3128#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>I hear you but coercion at the point of a bayonet hired by a few landlords was what we had before the Enlightenment. I still prefer democracy simmering in a &quot;social contract&quot; sauce. However, if there is such a thing as &quot;peaceful and mutually voluntary relationships&quot; outside of the Rotary Club, tell me how to get there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you but coercion at the point of a bayonet hired by a few landlords was what we had before the Enlightenment. I still prefer democracy simmering in a &#8220;social contract&#8221; sauce. However, if there is such a thing as &#8220;peaceful and mutually voluntary relationships&#8221; outside of the Rotary Club, tell me how to get there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Immorality of the Social Contract by David M. Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://agoratelegraph.com/2012/04/29/the-immorality-of-the-social-contract/#comment-1817</link>
		<dc:creator>David M. Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 01:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agoratelegraph.com/?p=3128#comment-1817</guid>
		<description>@Boussac

People who prate about the &quot;Social Contract&quot; intend to gull their listeners into confusing what they&#039;re talking about with a &quot;business agreement.&quot; so they use the term &quot;contract.&quot; The only reason is to lend a false veneer of respectability to what--naked coercion at the point of a gun or bayonet--would never be taken seriously if it was stated outright.

What people use the so-called &quot;Social Contract&quot; to justify--the forcible subjection of the minority to the whim of those who claim to speak for the majority--has nothing to do with social trust and everything to do with exploitation and control.  

Finally, the ridiculous bromide that &quot;democracy is bad, but it&#039;s better than anything else&quot; is nonsensical.  How about peaceful and mutually voluntary relationships?  Isn&#039;t that better than glorified mob rule?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Boussac</p>
<p>People who prate about the &#8220;Social Contract&#8221; intend to gull their listeners into confusing what they&#8217;re talking about with a &#8220;business agreement.&#8221; so they use the term &#8220;contract.&#8221; The only reason is to lend a false veneer of respectability to what&#8211;naked coercion at the point of a gun or bayonet&#8211;would never be taken seriously if it was stated outright.</p>
<p>What people use the so-called &#8220;Social Contract&#8221; to justify&#8211;the forcible subjection of the minority to the whim of those who claim to speak for the majority&#8211;has nothing to do with social trust and everything to do with exploitation and control.  </p>
<p>Finally, the ridiculous bromide that &#8220;democracy is bad, but it&#8217;s better than anything else&#8221; is nonsensical.  How about peaceful and mutually voluntary relationships?  Isn&#8217;t that better than glorified mob rule?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Immorality of the Social Contract by Boussac</title>
		<link>http://agoratelegraph.com/2012/04/29/the-immorality-of-the-social-contract/#comment-1811</link>
		<dc:creator>Boussac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agoratelegraph.com/?p=3128#comment-1811</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a rather simplistic view of Rousseau&#039;s writing. The social contract is not a business agreement but the simple recognition that we must depend on others from the day we were born.  The social contract builds on social trust which is a fundamental ingredient in many recipes for success.The absence of the social contract rewards selfish behavior and leads to fascism. Again democracy is the worst political system with the exception of all the others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a rather simplistic view of Rousseau&#8217;s writing. The social contract is not a business agreement but the simple recognition that we must depend on others from the day we were born.  The social contract builds on social trust which is a fundamental ingredient in many recipes for success.The absence of the social contract rewards selfish behavior and leads to fascism. Again democracy is the worst political system with the exception of all the others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Unschool by Unschooling and Voluntaryism with Emberlea &#124; The Disindoctrination Podcast</title>
		<link>http://agoratelegraph.com/2011/12/14/how-to-unschool/#comment-1706</link>
		<dc:creator>Unschooling and Voluntaryism with Emberlea &#124; The Disindoctrination Podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agoratelegraph.com/?p=792#comment-1706</guid>
		<description>[...] of Voluntaryist Values. They discuss the left vs. the right as well as the Libertarian party. Unschooling, Agorism, Porcfest and moving to New Hampshire. Students being told to ignore people handing out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Voluntaryist Values. They discuss the left vs. the right as well as the Libertarian party. Unschooling, Agorism, Porcfest and moving to New Hampshire. Students being told to ignore people handing out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Social Anarchist&#8217;s Critique of Agorism by afreeman</title>
		<link>http://agoratelegraph.com/2012/04/16/a-social-anarchists-critique-of-agorism/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>afreeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agoratelegraph.com/?p=2747#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>This is from the No More Sunsets blog.
 http://no-more-sunsets.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is from the No More Sunsets blog.<br />
 <a href="http://no-more-sunsets.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://no-more-sunsets.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Social Anarchist&#8217;s Critique of Agorism by libertariangranola</title>
		<link>http://agoratelegraph.com/2012/04/16/a-social-anarchists-critique-of-agorism/#comment-1635</link>
		<dc:creator>libertariangranola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 06:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agoratelegraph.com/?p=2747#comment-1635</guid>
		<description>Where did this originally come from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did this originally come from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama &amp; Trayvon Martin Comics by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://agoratelegraph.com/2012/03/27/obama-trayvon-martin-comics/#comment-1550</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agoratelegraph.com/?p=2663#comment-1550</guid>
		<description>These comics reveal typical white people behavior...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These comics reveal typical white people behavior&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Critical Thinking Exercise &#8211; the Trayvon Martin Case by Puck T. Smith</title>
		<link>http://agoratelegraph.com/2012/03/25/critical-thinking-exercise-the-trayvon-martin-case/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>Puck T. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 10:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agoratelegraph.com/?p=2638#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>This is a bit to subtle for most people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bit to subtle for most people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

